.Article written by Cole Stanton

 

Coatings are an integral component of fire restoration, most crucially to prevent the recurrence of the smoke odor. Coatings implemented post-fire are not finish paints but can serve as primers while blocking stains and adhering to less-than-ideal surfaces. Those functions are valuable and fire-relevant, but alone insufficient. Fire damage sealers must primarily inhibit the release of fire-related odors days, weeks, months, and even years into the future. That performance is impossible for pedestrian primers.

 

Do you really need to know this much about “paint” to succeed at fire damage? Yes and no. The aim here is to help professionals ask the right questions, and who to call for accurate information. There is a confluence of confusion. New technology is rising up and forcing change to established practices. Education from oral tradition is graduating into eagerly-anticipated guidelines, standards, and certifications. Fragmentary regulation is inevitable, and like mold/lead/asbestos, there is talk of licensing. Contractors, large-loss consultants, and training providers struggle continually to incorporate innovation and consistency.

 

This article proposes to start with sorting our types of coatings for fire into distinct categories, also sorting the FFB (features, functions, benefits) we need/want from these products, and then connecting the dots.

 

SEALERS VS. ENCAPSULANTS

 

Restoration professionals typically group their specialty coatings for fire damage restoration into a category labeled with the umbrella term sealers. Yet even in professional circles, there are other popular category labels like encapsulants. Since the 1970s, encapsulation has been in many nations a legally-codified practice of permanent abatement of asbestos and lead-based paint (alongside abatement by removal as a “management-in-place” alternative).

 

However, for fire damage restoration, the long-standing and understandable concern is that an encapsulation coating could be misunderstood and applied to manage fire contaminants in place rather than removing the contaminants first. As is common across restoration disciplines, for fire the proper procedure is to remove contaminants, and then the coating is applied among the final steps to complete the mitigation process. Since encapsulant conveys an inherent sense of applying over an undesirable substance rather than removal, the word itself can be at cross-purposes with arguably the most fundamental principle of restoration.

 

THE INDUSTRY TODAY

 

For several years, a collaborative consensus body assembled by the Restoration Industries Association (RIA) and the Indoor Air Quality Association (IAQA) has been working on the first comprehensive standard for fire damage restoration. When completed, the goal is an ANSI-accredited and peer-reviewed standard that can set the bar for restoration, and provide a valuable tool for education. The finish line for that development process is now in sight, with the probability that a year from the publication of this article, the standard will be in broad use and enjoy industry-wide acceptance. Included in this standard among the addressed elements of restoration will be a Tools, Materials, and Equipment chapter.

 

From history to the present, absent a standard, the restorer has had to rely upon everything from oral tradition to the training provider’s own developed curriculum, plus a smattering of industry guidelines. It is an understatement that this is a contributing factor to the aforementioned uneven at best training and usage when it comes to smoke damage sealers.

 

What the industry does have is the RIA’s Guidelines for Fire and Smoke Damage Repair (formerly the ASCR Guidelines). Written by the late Martin L. King, an undisputed fire pioneer and then-RIA Technical Advisor, the Guidelines were reviewed by over 300 restorers, adjusters, and members of the insurance community. The 2007 second edition does contain useful guidance on choice and uses of sealers in fire restoration.

 

OVERALL SEALER LIMITATIONS

 

The most common concern regarding the use of sealers involves overreliance on these tools instead of conducting source removal properly. Sealers can be useful and complementary tools to professionally-conducted contaminant removal, cleaning, and deodorization.

 

When sealer use is intended, it is important that all materially-interested parties concur that the agreed-upon extent of cleaning and deodorization has been fulfilled. Thorough cleaning and odor removal performed before sealing is the most reliable way to prevent the reappearance of fire residues and odors. Ideally, an intensive visual and olfactory examination of the areas in question should be performed prior to the application of any sealer.

 

If a third-party consulting professional is engaged in the design and monitoring of the project, it should be required in the project scope that an opportunity is given for that entity to conduct an inspection (or PRV-Post Remediation Verification) before sealer application begins.

 

FIRE SEALERS ORGANIZING THE DATA

 

The Guidelines provide an excellent start for prioritizing the FFB of generally high importance to the restorer.  Here are six criteria to consider:

 

  1. Does it STICK?
  2. Will it SUPPRESS fire odors?
  3. Can reliably SEAL bleeding stains and residues?
  4. SELECTIVELY, can water vapor “breathe”?
  5. Will it SIMPLIFY complications of cleanup, etc.?
  6. Is it SUSTAINABLE to use for years to come?

 

The Guidelines excerpts reinforce our six integral attributes by requiring stain/bleed-thru blocking, and permeability.  The additional key FFB found in the excerpts from the RIA Guidelines:

 

  1. The sealer should be specifically for fire damage restoration (not a primer or product intended for some other purpose)
  2. The sealer has to be capable of providing a continuous and unbroken film
  3. Vapors and odors should be avoided when possible due to sensitive or vulnerable occupants

 

Can we round out this punch list to an even top 10 for fire sealers?   Absolutely:

 

  1. Trust:  Identify manufacturers and suppliers that have invested the time to understand the demands inherent to fire damage restoration and the needs of the fire restoration professional. Remember that coatings and chemicals are not intuitive.  The PRO can pickup a handtool and get a sense of relative quality and probable performance.

 

SEALER FORMULATION TYPES: ATTRIBUTES & LIMITATIONS

 

Now that we’ve talked about how to choose a sealer, it’s time to clarify the different sealer types including their capabilities and limitations. The four readily-apparent sealer categories are:

 

  • Shellac
  • Alkyd
  • Water-based
  • Fixatives

 

Understanding the attributes and limitations of the sealers available can, in large part, be organized by the type of chemical formulation. The attributes and limitations that follow are by necessity generalizations for the purpose of organizing content and concepts.  Specific manufacturers and particular products can offer innovations that may transcend a category. However, when a product makes claims that supersede the typical characteristics attributed to that formulation type, that anomaly signals the restorer to require additional information to substantiate.

 

As you take a look at these attributes, here are some questions to ponder to help you decide which sealer is  best for your company’s average application, or unique job:

 

  • Which capabilities and limitations match the project’s needs best?
  • Which criteria are most important to you when choosing a sealer? (i.e. performance, price, VOCs, sustainability, etc.)

 

CONTINUED INNOVATION

 

Innovation will continue, and the imminent fire restoration standard will raise the bar for professional restoration. In large part, however, the 10 criteria for sealer selection are not likely to change much.  Much of it is based on common sense, as well as decades of collective experience. The goal here is not to make recommendations, but to bring together in one place the crucial criteria. Substantiate their importance, and organize the information into a simpler system for product evaluation. As is true throughout the restoration. More informed decisions from better access to information will result in an improved and more sustainable industry for our professionals and the public we serve.

Containment 101: Using Tape to Build High-Performance Containment Systems